Gender and participation in decision-making in labor-managed firms: The context of the USA

Author:

Miller Genna R1

Affiliation:

1. Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,

Abstract

Workers’ participation in making business decisions is a key aspect of the management structure of labor-managed firms. However, studies of the variables that determine the degree to which an individual participates in decision-making fail to consider the impact of gender relations. This paper first argues that the organizational features of labor-managed firms have a significant impact on participation. Second, the paper argues that that these organizational features and other explanatory variables have different effects on women’s and men’s participation, due to patriarchal gender relations. Third, this paper tests these theories using data from American labor-managed firms. Several of the variables and organizational features have significantly different impacts on women’s and men’s participation. Notably, occupational status, the surplus distribution method, the wage differential, performance measurements, and the level of cross-training each have gender-differentiated effects on participation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference75 articles.

1. The motivational role of an external agent in the informationally-participatory firm

2. Askildsen JE, Ireland N. and Law P. ( 1988) Some consequences of differential shareholders among members in a labor-managed and labor-owned firm. In: Jones D and Svejnar J (eds) Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-managed Firms . Vol. 3. Greenwich, Connecticut : JAI Press, 65-81.

3. Bennett J. ( 1988) Optimal wage rates and profit sharing in a firm . In: Jones D and Svejnar J (eds) Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-managed Firms. Vol. 3. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 149-165.

4. Bowles S. and Gintis H. ( 1993) The democratic firm: an agency-theoretic evaluation . In: Bowles S, Gintis H and Gustafsson B (eds) Markets and Democracy: Participation, Accountability and Efficiency . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13-39.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3