Risk of Bias in Cluster Randomised Controlled Trials of Individual-Level Interventions: Protocol for a Semi-Structured Interview Study

Author:

Easter Christina1ORCID,Kristunas Caroline2,Hemming Karla1,Greenfield Sheila1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

2. Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Abstract

Background Many cluster randomised trials of individual-level interventions are at risk of bias, mostly due to identification and recruitment biases, which would not feature under individual randomisation. This bias arises when participants are recruited into the trial with knowledge of the treatment arm they’ve been allocated to. These trials are also at risk of other biases including lack of clear documentation of primary outcome and apparent unconcealed randomisation. Many of these other risks are easily surmountable, and might reflect poor reporting rather than poor practice, or signal lack of knowledge. Objectives To determine whether investigators are aware of the common sources of risks of bias in cluster trials, and methods to mitigate these risks. We will explore why these biases occur in light of what is known about preventing them and what enables these risks to be mitigated. We will also explore the reasons for adopting cluster randomisation. Setting Principal investigators, statisticians and trialists with experience in conducting cluster randomised trials identified via an existing sampling frame of 104 contemporary cluster trials of individual-level interventions. Methods A realist approach will be used to underpin this study. We will conduct semi-structured interviews over Zoom to identify the rationale behind using a cluster trial when the intervention is at the level of the individual, and knowledge of the importance of blinding for those identifying and recruiting participants. Data collected from the interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. Themes within the data will be mainly captured with the research question in mind but will remain flexible. Anticipated results We aim to understand the reasons why cluster trials are being conducted when they are at risk of bias. It is hoped that understanding these reasons will provide useful information so future cluster trialists are aware of these risks, and provided with practical solutions.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3