A Review of Approaches, Strategies and Ethical Considerations in Participatory Research With Children

Author:

Montreuil Marjorie123ORCID,Bogossian Aline4ORCID,Laberge-Perrault Emilie1,Racine Eric567

Affiliation:

1. Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

2. Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Quebec, Canada

3. Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire en santé mentale Douglas, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

4. School of Social Work, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada

5. Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada

6. Departments of Medicine & Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada

7. Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery & Medicine, and Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

Participatory research can change the view of children from research subjects to active partners. As active partners, children can be recognized as agents who can contribute to different steps of the research process. However, “participatory research” is an umbrella term that covers both the collection of data with children and children’s participation in making decisions related to the research process. As such, it raises particular challenges for researchers. Based on a pragmatic ethics approach, we were inspired by the realist review methodology to synthesize the current literature, identify different strategies used to engage children aged 12 and below in participatory research, and analyze how they affect children’s active participation and the ethical aspects related to each. Fifty-seven articles were retained for inclusion in the review. A variety of strategies were used to involve children in the research process, including discussion groups, training/capacity-building sessions, photography and filming, children as data collectors and questionnaires. The most prevalent ethical considerations identified were related to power dynamics and strategies to facilitate children’s expression and foster the authenticity of children’s voices. Researchers should address these ethical considerations to actively involve children within the research process and prevent tokenistic participation. Active inclusion of children in research could include co-identifying with them how they want to be involved in knowledge production (if they want to) from the beginning of a project.

Funder

Faculty of Medicine, McGill University

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3