Discovering New Connections: Insights From Individual and Collective Reflexivity in a Mixed Methods Study

Author:

Cayir Ebru1ORCID,Felder Tisha M.23,Nkwonta Chigozie A.4,Jackson Joynelle R.2,Dawson Robin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

2. College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

3. Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

4. Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Through intentionally engaging in reflexivity, researchers can be transparent about potential areas of social inquiry and analysis that might be subject to a priori assumptions, personal biases, and interpretations that are not rooted in the data. In the context of conducting research with others, reflexivity also includes a collective dimension in which each researcher’s positionality interacts with the others and shapes research outcomes. Fostering collective reflexivity within interdisciplinary teams enables the researchers to process conflicting perspectives, allow creative and innovative approaches to emerge, and develop a shared vision of the research concepts, methods, and outcomes. Despite its acknowledged value, the integral process of reflexivity is rarely documented in mixed methods social inquiry. In this article, we describe the process of reflexivity through individual and collective team insights gained within a mixed methods study that examined the lived experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding among African American women and their support partners. We describe three components of the reflexivity practice we engaged in: 1) Self-led; 2) Relational and team-led; 3) Methods-focused and team-led. We discuss how this process challenged, shaped, and enriched data analysis, data integration, and finally, our understanding of the research findings.

Funder

The Institute for African American Research at the University of South Carolina

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Inhalt;Gesellschaft der Unterschiede;2023-09-01

2. Frontmatter;Gesellschaft der Unterschiede;2023-09-01

3. Abbildungsverzeichnis;Gesellschaft der Unterschiede;2023-09-01

4. Abkürzungsverzeichnis;Gesellschaft der Unterschiede;2023-09-01

5. Literaturverzeichnis;Gesellschaft der Unterschiede;2023-09-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3