Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned

Author:

Gordon Allegra R.123ORCID,Calzo Jerel P.45,Eiduson Rose2,Sharp Kendall2,Silverstein Scout6,Lopez Ethan6,Thomson Katharine78,Reisner Sari L.3910

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

2. Division of Adolescent/Young Adults Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

3. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

4. Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, San Diego State University, CA, USA

5. Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego State University Research Foundation, CA, USA

6. Trans Folx Fighting Eating Disorders, USA

7. Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

8. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

9. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

10. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Increasingly, social life—and accordingly, social research—is conducted in online environments. Asynchronous online focus groups (AOFGs) have emerged as an important tool to conduct remote research with geographically diverse populations. However, there remain few systematic accounts of AOFG methods to guide researchers’ decision-making in designing and implementing studies. This paper seeks to address this gap by describing a recent study on body image and health among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) young adults. In this study, eight AOFGs were conducted in August-October 2019 with 66 TGD young adults residing in 25 U.S. states. Each AOFG lasted four consecutive days with two prompts posted by moderators per day. Overall, participant satisfaction with AOFGs was high: 98% reported their experience was excellent, very good, or good and 95% would be somewhat or very likely to sign up for another AOFG. This example is used to illustrate key methodological decision-points, acceptability of the method to participants, and lessons learned. The goal of this paper is to encourage other researchers, particularly health researchers, to consider using AOFGs and to engage with the method’s strengths and limitations in order to develop new opportunities for online technologies to enrich the field of qualitative health research.

Funder

Harvard Catalyst

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3