Sensitive, Challenging, and Difficult Topics: Experiences and Practical Considerations for Qualitative Researchers

Author:

Silverio Sergio A.1ORCID,Sheen Kayleigh S.2,Bramante Alessandra3,Knighting Katherine4,Koops Thula U.5,Montgomery Elsa6,November Lucy1,Soulsby Laura K.7,Stevenson Jasmin H.8,Watkins Megan9ORCID,Easter Abigail1,Sandall Jane1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK

2. School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

3. Humanitas San Pio X, Milan, Italy

4. Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom

5. Institut für Sexualforschung, Sexualmedizin, und Forensische Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

6. Department of Midwifery, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK

7. Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

8. Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom

9. Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Qualitative researchers often engage in work addressing challenging, difficult, or sensitive topics and are consequently exposed to the participants’ narratives which may be emotionally charged, distressing, or compromising. These narratives occasionally rest heavy on a researcher’s conscience or may linger in the mind. Much literature has assessed how best to keep participants safe, but less attention has been given to how we keep researchers safe. We therefore document the following: (1) Our experiences of the issues presented by undertaking qualitative research involving challenging, difficult, or sensitive topics; and (2) Practical principles devised to overcome these issues, ensuring safety and wellbeing amongst researchers engaging in these types of qualitative research. We provide guidance for qualitative researchers of all levels of experience and expertise on how best to protect and support themselves, their colleagues, and other collaborating research staff, when undertaking qualitative research which might otherwise feel uncomfortable or overwhelming to tackle.

Funder

The Lily Mae Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3