The Methodological Approach to a Process Evaluation of a Community and Provider-Driven Social Accountability Intervention to Increase Contraceptive Uptake and Use

Author:

Milford Cecilia1ORCID,Cordero Joanna2,Nai Dela3,Shamba Donat4,Fuseini Kamil3,Boydell Victoria5ORCID,Tarimo Afiba4,McMullen Heather6,Steyn Petrus2ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Wits MRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa

2. Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

3. Population Council Ghana, Accra, Ghana

4. Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar Es Dar Salaam Tanzania

5. School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK

6. Global Health Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary UK

Abstract

The community and provider-driven social accountability intervention (CAPSAI) project was a complex intervention consisting of interacting components, actors and processes, implemented in Ghana and Tanzania from 2018 to 2020. It aimed to measure the impact of a social accountability intervention implemented in family planning services, on contraceptive uptake and use. The intervention incorporated a process evaluation to identify key causal pathways and better understand factors influencing uptake and use, in the context in which the intervention was implemented. This study used a unique methodology to conduct the process evaluation, and looked at several outcomes, including service utilisation, continuation rates and attitudes and behaviours. Qualitative methods were used to evaluate the effects of the intervention – (1) context mapping, (2) a process evaluation of the different steps of the intervention, and (3) compiling cases of change. Document review, non-participant observation and in-depth interviews were conducted. Data analysis included summaries and coding of the qualitative data. Coding and thematic content analysis were conducted collaboratively across two countries and used a single codebook that was relevant to both countries, yet enabled country specific analysis. Each country team drafted reports that drew on the three data sets. Various lessons were learnt – including the importance of teamwork, development of standard operating procedures to guide practical study components, and how to prioritise study activities over a long study timeline. The study demonstrated that a process evaluation of a complex intervention across multiple countries is feasible, and was also able to yield differentiate results based on specificity in each country’s context. Based on this study, similar process evaluation activities can be replicated in future work.

Funder

United States Agency for International Development

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3