Virtual Synchronous Qualitative Data Collection Methods Used in Health and Social Sciences: A Scoping Review of Benefits, Challenges and Practical Insights

Author:

Dubé Marc-Olivier12ORCID,Meziane Rabia Sabah3,Hudon Anne456,Cavallo Sabrina457,Verduyckt Ingrid58,Zidarov Diana45

Affiliation:

1. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, Canada

2. School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada

3. School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ottawa University, Ottawa, ON, Canada

4. School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

5. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Institut Universitaire sur la Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) Centre-Sud-de-l’Ile-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

6. Ethics Research Center (CRÉ), Montréal, QC, Canada

7. Centre de Recherche Du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada

8. Laboratoire IV, École d’orthophonie et d’audiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

Abstract

In recent years, we have seen the use of virtual synchronous qualitative data-collection methods grow exponentially, especially within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although several recommendations for researchers conducting in-person interviews and focus groups are available in the scientific literature, they are not necessarily suited for application in a virtual context. To gain a better understanding of current practices and recommendations in virtual synchronous qualitative data collection, we conducted a scoping review. Information obtained from the 70 articles included in this review highlights the main benefits and challenges of virtual data-collection methods in research, compares differences with in-person means of data collection, and provides readers with practical insights for before, during, and after data collection. This comprehensive overview of the existing literature allowed us to outline the theoretical contributions and practical implications of our work as well as provide perspectives for future research. This scoping review can serve as a tool to inform researchers about how best to conduct virtual synchronous qualitative data collection based on other researchers’ prior experiences and the recommendations currently available in the literature.

Funder

Réseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3