Clinical Colleague and Clinical Academic: A Physician’s Autoethnographical Reflexive Account of Opportunities and Challenges as an ‘Insider’ Researcher

Author:

Warner Bronwen Elizabeth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK

Abstract

‘Insider’ positionality, where the researcher shares a context with those researched, has been considered in many settings but infrequently by physicians. In this reflexive autoethnographic account, a physician undertaking qualitative methods research exploring shared decision-making in the acute hospital setting describes and critically appraises her experience of studying physician colleagues. She considers each step of the research in turn with reference to her insider positionality which she came to realise was neither absolute nor fixed. Professional experience informed a clinically relevant line of inquiry while the sometimes uncomfortable transition between physician and researcher prompted reflection which added depth to the research question. Being an insider was beneficial in accessing potential participants, but the extent to which the ‘ethnographic toolkit’ of the physician-colleague social position defined recruitment success is discussed. Data collection during semi-structured interviews benefitted from a shared clinical language although this needed to be balanced with avoiding assumptions of shared meaning. There was heightened researcher consciousness of peer scrutiny on questioning the status quo and of workplace hierarchy when interviewing senior colleague ‘elites’. A sense of responsibility to colleagues and tendency to draw on personal clinical experience to make sense of an elusive thematic analysis became apparent during the analysis. The research experience ultimately led to increased confidence with inhabiting a role neither truly insider nor outsider. This critical account contributes to methodological understanding of reflexivity by physician qualitative researchers and seeks to benefit others embarking on a similar journey.

Funder

HCA International

The open access fee was paid from the Imperial College London Open Access Fund

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3