Resisting the Robotic – Moving Fluidly Towards Soulful Qualitative Analysis

Author:

Chung-Lee Leinic1ORCID,Lapum Jennifer1

Affiliation:

1. Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Qualitative inquiry is known for the generation of knowledge that is expressive, subjective, rich, and comprehensive. While there are prospects for qualitative research to inform and improve praxis, thin engagement with qualitative analysis threatens the meaningfulness of the produced findings. Novice and emerging researchers may long for the aid of a technical guide outlining procedural steps as they learn to become qualitative scholars. However, prescriptive and mechanical processing of data confines the researcher’s capacity to extend and leverage their creativity. Rather, it is through the researcher’s intuition and being “present” that one can begin to interact with data in a fluid and reflexive manner. Drawing on nursing practice, although relevant to other disciplines, this article challenges the robotic ways of analyzing qualitative data. We offer a discussion on robotic care versus Lanoix’s “thickly embodied and relational” care, nursing presence, and how one may apply patient-centred care to the analytical processes in qualitative research, not limited to nursing or healthcare research. By engaging in an embodied manner with analysis, possibilities are opened up for producing knowledge that is profound, compelling, and impactful. Using arts-based research approaches, we share an artistic-informed reflection on embracing uncertainty and finding strength in vulnerability while interacting with the art piece as a strategy for being reflexive. The art piece uses painting, fluid art specifically, to highlight the need for creativity and reflexivity in qualitative analysis. Through the embodied art experience with immersing oneself in creative space, we make the connection with enabling researchers to move fluidly, without restraint, towards soulful qualitative analysis.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3