Critical Ignoring as a Core Competence for Digital Citizens

Author:

Kozyreva Anastasia1,Wineburg Sam2,Lewandowsky Stephan345ORCID,Hertwig Ralph1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany

2. Graduate School of Education, Stanford University

3. School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol

4. School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia

5. Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam

Abstract

Low-quality and misleading information online can hijack people’s attention, often by evoking curiosity, outrage, or anger. Resisting certain types of information and actors online requires people to adopt new mental habits that help them avoid being tempted by attention-grabbing and potentially harmful content. We argue that digital information literacy must include the competence of critical ignoring—choosing what to ignore and where to invest one’s limited attentional capacities. We review three types of cognitive strategies for implementing critical ignoring: self-nudging, in which one ignores temptations by removing them from one’s digital environments; lateral reading, in which one vets information by leaving the source and verifying its credibility elsewhere online; and the do-not-feed-the-trolls heuristic, which advises one to not reward malicious actors with attention. We argue that these strategies implementing critical ignoring should be part of school curricula on digital information literacy. Teaching the competence of critical ignoring requires a paradigm shift in educators’ thinking, from a sole focus on the power and promise of paying close attention to an additional emphasis on the power of ignoring. Encouraging students and other online users to embrace critical ignoring can empower them to shield themselves from the excesses, traps, and information disorders of today’s attention economy.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Volkswagen Foundation

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Reference42 articles.

1. The Welfare Effects of Social Media

2. Learning How to Separate Fake from Real News: Scalable Digital Tutorials Promoting Students’ Civic Online Reasoning

3. Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks

4. Civic Preparation for the Digital Age: How College Students Evaluate Online Sources About Social and Political Issues

5. Breit J. (2018, July 20). How one of the internet’s biggest history forums deals with Holocaust deniers. Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2018/07/the-askhistorians-subreddit-banned-holocaust-deniers-and-facebook-should-too.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3