A Vital Fluid: Risk, Controversy and the Politics of Blood Donation in the Era of “Mad Cow Disease”

Author:

O’Neill Kate1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management at the University of California at Berkeley

Abstract

This article examines the reasons for, and likely impact of, the decision by the US and other countries to permanently defer blood donors who have spent time in Britain or Europe, for fear they may transmit new variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD), the human form of “mad cow disease.” It begins by discussing how vCJD and blood transfusion are linked, and how these have been translated into policy. First, maintaining a safe and stable supply of blood entails not only maintaining the trust of recipients in the system, but also that of donors, who need to be assured that their blood will be welcomed and used. Often, the balance, once upset, is regained by sacrificing donors, but accompanying costs might also be high. Second, the article highlights the impact of various forms of globalization—of commerce, disease and travel, and immigration—on blood policies and public and policy attitudes. Third, it assesses the decision by the US to restrict blood donations from Europeans and travelers to combat such a pervasive risk. The conclusion discusses how donor deferral policies may be interpreted by the public in the light of earlier discussions, and raises issues for future research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication

Reference16 articles.

1. 1 Scott Gottlieb, “FDA bans blood donation by people who have lived in UK,” British Medical Journal 319, no. 7209 (1999): 535-535 .

2. Civilization and madness: the great BSE scare of 1996

3. 7 Sherry Sheethaler, “In the face of uncertainty: batty bovines and empty blood banks,” Berkeley Science Review 3, no. 1 (2003): 44–44 .

4. 8 There is a large literature on risk and trust in modern society. Directly on this topic, see Paul Slovic, “Perceived risk, trust and democracy,” Risk Analysis 13, no. 6 (1993): 675–682 , and the introduction to Ragnar Löfstedt and Lynn Frewer, (eds), The Earthscan Reader in Risk and Modern Society (London: Earthscan, 1998).

5. 20 See: Ghani et al. “Predicted vCJD mortality in Great Britain,” Nature 406 (10 August 2000): 583–584 ; Valleron et al. “Estimation of epidemic size and incubation time based on age characteristics of vCJD in the United Kingdom,” Science 294 (23 November 2001): 1726–1728; Huillard d’Aignaux et al. “Predictability of the UK variant Creutzfeld–Jakob disease epidemic,” Science 294 (November 2001): 1729–1731; and Tim Radford, “Victims of CJD fewer than feared,” The Guardian (10 August 2000).

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3