Affiliation:
1. Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 875603, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA,
Abstract
Reviewing the main research approaches on the acceptance of science and technology (S&T) developed in the last decades, I will (1) summarize advances achieved and persisting problems concerning the understanding of both the public and S&T. I will show that the acceptance-centered framework has, at least implicitly, been linked to practical efforts in acceptance politics, i.e., attempts to improve a lack of acceptance. In order to investigate conflicts relating to S&T in a more reflective way, I will (2) suggest an epistemological shift towards the analysis of acceptance politics. Building on the distinction between the relevance and resonance of S&T, the ways in which S&T are valuated and gain legitimacy are investigated from a regime analytical perspective. I will (3) exemplify the advantages of this approach by comparatively analyzing the acceptance politics of three biotechnology applications in the USA and Germany. I will (4) conclude with an outlook on future research.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication
Reference50 articles.
1. Demokratische Technikbewertung
2. Changing regimes of science and politics: comparative and transnational perspectives for a world in transition
3. Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C. and Guston, D.H. ( 2008) "Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration," in E.J. Hackett , O. Amsterdamska, M.E. Lynch and J. Wajcman (eds.) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition, pp. 979-1000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献