Abstract
New knowledge has met with ambivalence, as is documented in myths ever since that of Prometheus. This ambivalence is also apparent in the representations of science in literature and the popular media, most prominent among them movies. Shelley’s Frankenstein has become the icon of the “mad scientist” as depicted by filmmakers ever since the 1930s. To trace such patterns of ambivalence and stereotypes of scientists and science in fiction film, 222 movies were analyzed. It is apparent that modification of, and intervention into, the human body, the violation of human nature, and threats to human health by means of science are depicted as the most alarming aspects of scientific inquiry. The threat is dramatized by being associated with the image of the scientist as pursuing the quest for new knowledge in secrecy, outside the controls of academic institutions and peers. Scientific research as perceived by fiction film is seldom a venture across the boundaries of the permissible.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication
Reference4 articles.
1. Back, Kurt W. (1995) ‘Frankenstein and Brave New World: Two Cautionary Myths on the Boundaries of Science’ , History of European Ideas 20: 1-3 , 327-332.
2. Gerbner, George (1987) ‘Science on Television: How it Affects Public Conceptions’ , Issues in Science and Technology Spring: 109-115 .
3. Kirby, David A. (2000) ‘The New Eugenics in Cinema: Genetic Determinism and Gene Therapy in GATTACA’ , Science Fiction Studies 27: 193-215 .
4. Osterland, Martin (1968) ‘Wissenschaftler und Wissenschaft im Film’ , Atomzeitalter 1-2: 57-64 .
Cited by
91 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献