Playing God? Media coverage of CRISPR in the United States

Author:

Stapleton Patricia1ORCID,Torres Yabar Alessandra2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. RAND Corporation, USA

2. Universidad Científica del Sur, Perú; University of Birmingham, UK

Abstract

Announcements in 2017 and 2018 that scientists used a gene editing technique called Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) to permanently alter human embryos have highlighted the urgency in regulating the technology’s ethical, political, and legal implications. To better understand how a regulatory regime might evolve in response to CRISPR, we must examine how the media covers it. This article reviews online and television news sources in the United States to determine the tone, content, and frequency in media coverage of CRISPR. We find that coverage remained ambiguous and infrequent, as scientific research into CRISPR’s clinical potential for treating human disease surged. This infrequent coverage indicates that the media have not yet established the salience of CRISPR to a degree that engages the public or policymakers, though the issue will continue to gain importance as CRISPR transitions from experimental efforts into clinical practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication

Reference53 articles.

1. AllSides (n.d.) Media bias ratings. Available at: https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/ratings (accessed September 2019).

2. CRISPR: Implications for materials science

3. Barclay E (2017) Scientists successfully used CRISPR to fix a mutation that causes diseases: This is huge. Vox, 2 August. Available at: https://www.vox.com/science-and-powerfhealth/2017/8/2/16083300/crispr-heart-disease

4. Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues

5. Blake A (2014) Ranking the media from liberal to conservative, based on their audiences. The Washington Post, 21 October. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/10/21/lets-rank-the-media-from-liberal-to-conservative-based-on-their-audiences

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3