Who are the publics engaging in AI?

Author:

Sieber RenéeORCID,Brandusescu Ana1ORCID,Adu-Daako Abigail2ORCID,Sangiambut Suthee1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. McGill University, Canada

2. University of California, Berkeley, USA

Abstract

Given the importance of public engagement in governments’ adoption of artificial intelligence systems, artificial intelligence researchers and practitioners spend little time reflecting on who those publics are. Classifying publics affects assumptions and affordances attributed to the publics’ ability to contribute to policy or knowledge production. Further complicating definitions are the publics’ role in artificial intelligence production and optimization. Our structured analysis of the corpus used a mixed method, where algorithmic generation of search terms allowed us to examine approximately 2500 articles and provided the foundation to conduct an extensive systematic literature review of approximately 100 documents. Results show the multiplicity of ways publics are framed, by examining and revealing the different semantic nuances, affordances, political and expertise lenses, and, finally, a lack of definitions. We conclude that categorizing publics represents an act of power, politics, and truth-seeking in artificial intelligence.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference83 articles.

1. Abdala MB, Ortega A, Pomares J (2020) Managing the transition to a multi-stakeholder artificial intelligence governance. Technology. Available at: https://www.g20-insights.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/managing-the-transition-to-a-multi-stakeholder-artificial-intelligence-governance-1606764749.pdf (accessed 15 May 2022).

2. Human intervention in automated decision-making

3. Balaram B, Greenham T, Leonard J (2018) Artificial Intelligence: Real Public Engagement. London: RSA. Available at: https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/reports/rsa_artificial-intelligence—real-public-engagement.pdf (accessed 15 May 2022).

4. Battina DS (2017) Research on artificial intelligence for citizen services and government. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) 5(2): 769–773. Available at: https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT1134263.pdf (accessed 10 October 2022).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3