Forests high on CO2: A glimpse into how scientists study the biochemical machinery of forest ecosystems

Abstract

Are forests across the planet storing more carbon as a result of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration? In this text, I propose to reflect on the work of researchers who are asking that very question. The focus is on a particular approach called free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments, in which forests in their local environment are subjected to a CO2 concentration higher than in the ambient air, to test the CO2 fertilization hypothesis. This hypothesis predicts that forests store more carbon in those conditions. FACE studies held the promise of establishing cause–effect relations and transcending the here and now. They emerged in the United States in the late 1980s, at a time when ecology scaled up to make itself relevant to the then nascent Earth System science. FACE experiments in forests are now conducted in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Brazil, and their results are closely scrutinized by a small research community. The text, first, presents the engineering feat that underpins FACE experiments in forests and discuss two problems highlighted by scientists because they impede hasty generalization from the data: the timescale needed to witness forests change and the spatial heterogeneity of forest soils. It then shows how scientists contend with their incomplete understanding of forest ecosystems as they bring together computer models and empirical data to build consensus around the sources of epistemic uncertainty. To conclude, I propose to rework the idea of “the macroscope” to conceptualize what scientists do when they seek to study forests as complex, layered, multi-scale systems. I wish to capture how researchers, who willingly endorse a planetary gaze, problematize their own predicament. This, as I suggest, has to do with the immanence of forests in the world.