Affiliation:
1. Australian National University, Australia
2. University of Tasmania, Australia
Abstract
In the face of climate change, Western environmental research and governance processes and institutions are increasingly seeking to learn from and harness Indigenous peoples knowledges, perspectives, and practices of land and water management. There are both opportunities and risks for Indigenous groups seeking to exploit these opportunities to (re)connect with their homelands and reinvigorate dormant cultural practices. This article considers these issues by highlighting the barriers, risks, and opportunities, across three case environmental study sites – cultural burning, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping, and marine science. We offer Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous data governance as both guiding principles and a practical blueprint that can make safe these intercultural environmental collaborations by mitigating against perverse or unintended consequences of Indigenous knowledge theft, as well as maximising opportunities to foster sustainable self-determination and self-governance.
Reference109 articles.
1. Adams W (2002) Nature and the colonial mind. In: Adams W, Mulligan M (eds) Decolonizing Nature: Strategies for Conservation in a Post-colonial Era. New York: Routledge. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/Decolonizing-Nature-Strategies-for-Conservation-in-a-Post-colonial-Era/Adams-Mulligan/p/book/9781853837494
2. Being Indigenous: Resurgences against Contemporary Colonialism
3. Altman J, Fisher R (2020) The world’s best fire management system is in Northern Australia, and it’s led by Indigenous land managers. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/the-worlds-best-fire-management-system-is-in-northern-australia-and-its-led-by-indigenous-land-managers-133071
4. The Biocultural Labels Initiative: Supporting Indigenous rights in data derived from genetic resources
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献