Affiliation:
1. American Institutes for Research
2. Harvard University
Abstract
Validity studies of college admissions tests have found that, on average, students who are Black or Hispanic earn lower freshman grade-point averages (FGPAs) than predicted by these test scores. This differential prediction is used as a measure of bias. These studies, however, conflate student and school characteristics. The differential prediction affecting minoritized groups may arise in part because they attended high schools in which college enrollees, regardless of race, perform worse than predicted. Using data on students who graduated from New York City public high schools in 2011 and enrolled in the City University of New York, we examined this using college admissions and high school test scores. There was no differential prediction based on race/ethnicity among students within high schools when school characteristics were accounted for. Instead, overprediction of FGPA was associated with the school proportion of enrolled Black and Hispanic students. Overprediction was larger in models with high school test scores.
Funder
Harvard Kennedy School
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Reference32 articles.
1. Allensworth E. M., Clark K. (2020). High school GPAs and ACT scores as predictors of college completion: Examining assumptions about consistency across high schools. Edu-cational Researcher, 49(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20902110
2. Fixed Effects Regression Models
3. Bell B. A., Morgan G. B., Kromrey J. D., Ferron J. M. (2010). The impact of small cluster size on multilevel models: A Monte Carlo examination of two-level models with binary and continuous predictors. JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section, 1(1), 4057–4067. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2010/Files/308112_60089.pdf
4. Buchmann C., Condron D. J., Roscigno V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0105