Affiliation:
1. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
2. San Diego State University, CA, USA
Abstract
Results from an international field study conducted on three different casino floors indicated significantly elevated win levels on reel slots with increased house advantages. This work extended that of Lucas and Spilde, which found the same. Our study expanded their work by dramatically increasing the difference in the pars of paired slot titles, which were otherwise identical games. Still, the high par games outperformed their low par counterparts in the all-important metric of T-win. In addition, like Lucas and Spilde, the results of time series regression analyses failed to indicate signs that players were detecting a difference in the pars of the paired games. Specifically, there was no evidence of play migration from the high par game to the low par game. This result provided a valuable addition to the literature, replicating an outcome that refuted a popular operating theory. Moreover, the result was reproduced with considerably expanded differences in pars. Overall, the results supported the ideas that (a) players could not detect the egregious differences in the pars of otherwise identical games and (b) operators may be able recognize material gains in revenues from increasing pars. Both of these outcomes challenged the inveterate wisdom of the industry.
Funder
Sycuan Institute on Tribal Gaming
Subject
Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献