Affiliation:
1. University of Sheffield,
2. University of Oxford,
Abstract
The National Offender Management Service (NOMS), intended to integrate the Probation and Prison Services of England and Wales and to provide an operational framework for the end-to-end management of offenders throughout their sentences, was introduced in summer 2004. This major innovation came fast after a period of immense change to probation services which had culminated in the formation of the National Probation Service (NPS) in 2001. The present study, in which 41 probation practitioners from four probation areas were interviewed, sought to gain insight into frontline perspectives on the impact of NOMS. The study indicates that communication to frontline staff about NOMS has not been wholly effective and many practitioners are experiencing `initiative confusion' and `change fatigue' in endeavouring to meet an increasing range of demands from an expanding range of `masters'. While many remain open to the possible benefits of NOMS, particularly for offenders, considerable uncertainty remains about the implications of NOMS for themselves and the Probation Service. The `ogre of contestability' is linked with fears about future job security, whilst other aspects of the NOMS agenda are adding to a sense of demoralization and increasing alienation from the values that brought some into the service.
Reference40 articles.
1. Allen, R. and M. Hough (2006) `Endnote' in M. Hough, R. Allen and U. Padel, (eds) Reshaping Probation and Prisons: The New Offender Management Framework, pp. 95—102. London: The Policy Press.
2. Effective probation practice and NOMS
3. The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献