Affiliation:
1. University of Durham, UK
Abstract
Evaluations of domestic violence perpetrator programmes have not produced evidence that they are as effective at reducing male, non-violent, coercively controlling behaviours. This article proposes such limitations are understood by adopting a more complex conceptualisation of coercive control for which the reasons are both gendered and biographically unique. Drawing on document analyses and in-depth interviews with eight programme facilitators and an in-depth case study of one male participant, this article explores the merits and limitations of the cognitive behavioural, skills-based criminal justice programme, Building Better Relationships, in addressing coercively controlling behaviours. The dual (re)conceptualisation of coercive control proposed has implications for both practice and programme evaluation methods.
Funder
Economic Social and Research Council
Reference35 articles.
1. Coercive Control
2. Bloomfield S, Dixon L (2015) An outcome evaluation of the integrated domestic abuse programme (IDAP) and community domestic violence programme (CDVP). London: National Offender Management Service. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/449008/outcome-evaluation-idap-cdvp.pdf.
3. Bollas, C (1993) Being a Character, Abingdon: Routledge.
4. Responding to denial, minimization and blame in correctional settings: The ‘real world’ implications of offender neutralizations
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献