Preferences for Participation in Treatment Decision Making and Information Needs of Parents of Children With Cancer: A Pilot Study

Author:

Pyke-Grimm Kimberly A.1,Degner Lesley2,Small Acita2,Mueller Bryan2

Affiliation:

1. Children's Hospital of Winnipeg, CE226-820 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3A 1S1

2. Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital of Winnipeg,Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, St. Boniface General Hospital Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Abstract

This study was performed to obtain information on parents of children with cancer: (a) what role parents preferred to assume in treatment decision making (TDM); (b) parents' priority information needs; (c) if a relationship existed between TDM preferences and information needs; and (d) if sociodemographic, disease and treatment variables predicted TDM preferences or information needs. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 58 parents who had a child less than 13 years of age diagnosed with cancer in the previous year. Instruments included a Sociodemographic, Disease, and Treatment Questionnaire; the Control Preferences Scale for Pediatrics, and an Information Needs Questionnaire. The results showed that parents had systematic preferences about TDM, preferring collaborative followed by passive and active roles. Nine priorities in information needs (highest to lowest) were found: (a) treatments and tests, (b) cure, (c) caring for my child, (d) emotional impact, (e) side effects, (f) physical impact, (g) disease, (h) coping with painful procedures, and (i) impact on the family. Sociodemographic, disease and treatment variables were not predictive of preferences for TDM or information needs. Concrete informational needs take precedence over issues of emotional or family impact or pain. A low Kendall's coefficient (0.07) indicated that parents as a group do not have uniform information needs. Information giving must be individualized.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Pediatrics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3