New Media Activism and Politics of Ecology in the People’s Republic of China

Author:

Joseph Justin1,Karackattu Joe Thomas2

Affiliation:

1. School of Liberal Arts and Applied Sciences, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science (HITS), Chennai, India.

2. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT-M), Chennai, India.

Abstract

The environmental sector is an interesting realm in Chinese politics to observe factors such as the contributions of new media activism in bottom-up communication and decision-making processes, especially during the 40 years of reform and opening up. Top-down efforts to curb environmental issues are primarily to address increasing pubic discomfort due to pollution and related problems. However, environmental movements are increasingly visible in China despite their application of stability maintenance mechanisms such as Environmental Police. It is therefore noteworthy to deeply analyse the factors that contribute to the increasing scale of movements in the country. This study examines the role of new media activism (occurring due to the public’s interactions through WeChat, Weibo, QQ, etc.) in shaping the trajectory of environmental movements in China. How are these avenues supporting alternative communication channels outside the mainstream policy making apparatus? Is the government willing to incorporate the interests developed in these channels to policymaking realms? How these behavioural changes are influencing the state–society relations in contemporary China in the context of increasing environmental concerns. The study employs agency-structure framework to analyse the interactions between new media activism and the single party ruling political structure with the support fieldwork data from China. The study examines policy documents, official declarations of the communist party, public attitude towards new media activism, and so on, in order to present a comprehensive understanding on the politics of ecology in the PRC.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference47 articles.

1. Anderson Porter. 2018. ‘Three Ways PEN’s New Report Says China is Compromising Free Expression’. Publishing Perspectives. https://publishingperspectives.com/2018/03/three-ways-pen-report-says-china-compromises-free-expression/ (accessed on 21July2020).

2. Bradsher Keith. 2011. ‘China Moves Swiftly to Close Chemical Plant After Protests’. New York Times, 14 August. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/world/asia/15dalian.html

3. Wild Public Networks and Affective Movements in China: Environmental Activism, Social Media, and Protest in Maoming

4. Chen Sibo. 2014. Environmental Communication with Chinese Characteristics: Crises, Conflicts, and Prospects (Doctoral dissertation, Communication, Art & Technology), Simon Fraser University (SFU). http://summit.sfu.ca/item/14799

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3