Russian–Chinese Cooperation at the United Nations Security Council: Costly Signalling and Trust Building in the Strategic Partnership

Author:

Machaffie James P.1

Affiliation:

1. School of History, Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Abstract

China and Russia have a demonstrable record of coordinating their votes at the United Nations Security Council over the past 12 years. China, in particular, has coordinated its vetoes to align with Russia, while Russia still uses its veto in isolation of other states, except for Chinese abstentions. It is widely acknowledged in the literature on Chinese–Russian foreign relations that the two states are in a strategic partnership; however, there is open debate as to how long this partnership can be sustained.  Both China and Russia seem to value the partnership, but trust-building is needed to sustain it due to the growing power imbalance between them. One way that trust can be built is through costly signalling, which provides reassurances to the receiving state that the signaller has benign intentions.  This article argues that China is engaged in costly signalling to Russia by aligning its votes with Moscow at the expense of angering the other permanent members of the Security Council—the United States, France and the United Kingdom—which in turn sours the relations between them. China is attempting to reassure Russia, the weaker partner, that it still values their friendship, and Russia has reciprocated by relying more on China.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference88 articles.

1. Agence France-Presse. 1999, 2 March. ‘Albright Attacks China on Macedonia Veto’. Academic LexisNexis.

2. Agence France-Presse. 2019. ‘China Slams Pompeo Criticism of Syria Aid Veto’. https://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2019/12/23/China-slams-Pompeo-criticism-of-Syria-aid-veto-

3. Alden R. 1972. ‘U.S. Casts a Veto in U.N. on Mideast, Citing Terrorism.’ New York Times, 11 September. https://www.nytimes.com/1972/09/11/archives/us-casts-a-veto-in-un-on-mideast-citing-terrorism-opposes-call-for.html

4. The Empathic Foundations of Security Dilemma De‐escalation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3