Affiliation:
1. The University of Queensland, Australia
2. University of Tasmania, Australia
Abstract
Academic and lay discourses around disadvantaged urban areas often draw on the language of ‘dumping grounds’ to encapsulate the poverty, marginalisation and social problems often found there. Yet the concept of a dumping ground remains insufficiently theorised. This paper addresses this issue by identifying five constituent features of the dumping ground: the perception of people as waste whose fate is to be discarded; the need to accommodate this human ‘waste’ and the logic by which places are selected for this purpose; the mechanisms through which this spatial sorting occurs as problem populations are moved to their ‘rightful’ place; the relations of power which enforce or encourage this mobility; and finally, the reactions of incumbent residents in neighbourhoods that are compelled to host unwanted social groups. In the second part of this paper, these themes are illustrated via a case study of the Australian city of Logan where residents complain that their city has been treated as a dumping ground in order to explain its poor reputation.
Subject
Urban Studies,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference56 articles.
1. `Ordinary, the Same as Anywhere Else'
2. Padding the Bunker: Strategies of Middle-class Disaffiliation and Colonisation in the City
3. Atkinson R, Jacobs K (2008) Public housing in Australia: Stigma, home and opportunity. Housing and Community Research Unit, paper no. 1. University of Tasmania, Australia.
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Census of population and housing: Basic community profiles: Logan City. Catalogue No. 2001.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献