Abstract
This paper traces the financialisation of policy instruments regulating floor space, namely, building height restrictions in Mumbai from 1880 to 2015. It describes and explains the shift from prescriptive regulation to hybrid market-based incentive. Drawing on original archival research and interviews with 80 policy experts, findings show that height restrictions shifted from ad hoc rules, to prescribed heights, to floor space index, and finally to market-based air rights. Paradoxically, the local state has used financialised floor space as an incentive to achieve social goals such as slum redevelopment, while the policy remains controversial and beset by conflict. The state has played a key role in financialising floor space, in the process creating a hybrid instrument with multiple constituencies. The conclusion explores how a history of building regulations can advance comparative urbanism.
Subject
Urban Studies,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference57 articles.
1. The Variegated Financialization of Housing
2. Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs
3. Bharucha N (2017) TDR Buildings of last 20 years can fill up 9 Nariman Points and BKC. Times of India, 13 August. Available at: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/tdr-buildings-of-last-20-years-can-fill-up-9-nariman-points-and-bkc/articleshow/60041707.cms (accessed 3 February 2022).
4. Understanding Process Tracing
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献