Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods

Author:

Oyama Taiji1ORCID,Suzuki Satoko1,Horiguchi Yasuo1,Yamane Ai1,Akao Kenichi1,Nagamori Koushi1,Tsumoto Kouhei23

Affiliation:

1. JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan

2. The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

3. Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is a widely used technique for assessing the higher-order structure (HOS) of biopharmaceuticals, including antibody drugs. Since the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use established quality control guidelines, objective evaluation of spectral similarity has been required in order to assess structural comparability. Several spectral distance quantification methods and weighting functions to increase sensitivity have been proposed, but not many reports have compared their performance for CD spectra. We constructed comparison sets that combine actual spectra and simulated noise and performed a comprehensive performance evaluation of each spectral distance calculation method and weighting function under conditions that consider spectral noise and fluctuations from pipetting errors. The results showed that using the Euclidean distance or Manhattan distance with Savitzky–Golay noise reduction is effective for spectral distance assessment. For the weighting function, it is preferable to combine the spectral intensity weighting function and the noise weighting function. In addition, the introduction of the external stimulus weighting function should be considered to improve the sensitivity. It is crucial to select the weighting function based on the balance between spectral changes and noise distributions for robust, sensitive antibody HOS similarity assessment.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Spectroscopy,Instrumentation

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3