Affiliation:
1. Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany,
bernhard.nauck@phil.tu-chemnitz.de
Abstract
In the current article, the author (a) integrates two major theoretical approaches for the explanation of inheritance expectations, namely, the institutional approach of cultural anthropology and the interactionist approach of family research and social gerontology; (b) takes into account the institutional settings of kinship systems and inheritance regimes on the societal level; and (c) relates these institutional settings to the intergenerational relationships between parents and parents-in-law and their offspring. At the societal level, these relations are formulated as two hypotheses: The lineage hypothesis refers to the inheritance regime and its impact on individual inheritance expectations, whereas the welfare hypothesis refers to the relation between levels of affluence and quality of inheritance (instrumental or expressive inheritance).The empirical analysis is based on standardized interviews with women from India, China, Palestine, Turkey, Indonesia, Russia, Germany, and the United States (N = 5,282), which were collected for the Value of Children in Six Cultures research project. Descriptive results show strong cross-cultural differences in matrilineal, patrilineal, and bilineal inheritance expectations. In subsequent multivariate logistic regression analyses, the author tested societal, relational, and individual predictors on inheritance expectations. The results support the lineage and welfare hypotheses but provide no evidence for exchange-based assumptions on the effects of the quality of intergenerational relationships on inheritance expectations.
Subject
Anthropology,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference37 articles.
1. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns — different regimes?
2. Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds. THE BURGESS AWARD LECTURE*
3. Solidarity, Conflict, and Ambivalence: Complementary or Competing Perspectives on Intergenerational Relationships?
4. Bengtson, V.L. & Putney, N.M. ( 2000). Who will care for tomorrow’s elderly? Consequences of population aging East and West. In V. L. Bengtson, K. D. Kim, G. C. Myers, & K. S. Eun (Eds.), Aging in East and West: Families, states, and the elderly (pp. 263-286). New York, NY: Springer.
5. Intergenerational Solidarity in Aging Families: An Example of Formal Theory Construction
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献