Teacher Education in India’s National Education Policy 2020: Knowledge Traditions, Global Discourses and National Regulations

Author:

Sharma Gunjan1ORCID,Mittal Radhika1ORCID,Zayan 2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Education Studies, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, New Delhi, India

2. Nazariya, a Queer Feminist Resource Group, New Delhi, India

Abstract

This article engages with the teacher education (TE) reform approach adopted in India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. It locates the policy recommendations in the context and challenges of TE in India and makes sense of the NEP’s vision for the domain. It examines the knowledge traditions and global education policy (GEP) discourses that underlie the proposed reforms, and the translation of the core reform ideas in the national regulatory framework for implementation. The first part of the findings identifies the knowledge traditions and influences of GEP inherent in the policy and argues that NEP’s reform approach is an assemblage of fundamentally inconsistent discourses. The second part examines the regulatory norms and standards of the NEP-recommended TE programme to understand what makes it distinct as compared to similar ongoing programmes. Based on the analysis, the article argues that the proposed new programme is a tweaked version of India’s conventional TE approaches.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Reference62 articles.

1. Alexander R. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Blackwell Publishers.

2. Arunima G. (2020, ‘ 4 August). Light but tight’: Whose National Education Policy is it anyway? Outlook. https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/opinion-light-but-tight-whose-national-education-policy-is-it-anyway/357968

3. WHAT IS POLICY? TEXTS, TRAJECTORIES AND TOOLBOXES

4. Batra P. (2017). RTE amendment giving teachers more time to get qualified is poorly thought out and contrary to law. Scroll.in. https://scroll.in/article/847310/rte-amendment-giving-teachers-more-time-to-get-qualified-is-poorly-thought-out-and-contrary-to-law

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Old, but Not Stale: Revisiting the National Education Policy 2020;Contemporary Education Dialogue;2024-07

2. Research on the Analysis Model System of Examination Assessment of Digital Competence;2023 International Conference on Educational Knowledge and Informatization (EKI);2023-09-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3