Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine versus detemir analysis in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Silva Thales B. C.12,Almeida Paulo H. R. F.12,Araújo Vania E.134,Acurcio Francisco de Assis12,Guerra Júnior Augusto A.12,Godman Brian5ORCID,Alvares Juliana12

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Minas Gerais, Brazil

2. SUS Collaborating Center for Technology Assessment and Excellence in Health (CCATES), Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Minas Gerais, Brazil

3. SUS Collaborating Center for Technology Assessment and Excellence in Health (CCATES), Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais Brazil

4. School of Dentistry, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUCMG), Minas Gerais, Brazil

5. Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) is an autoimmune disease characterized by metabolic destruction of pancreatic cells responsible for insulin production, with treatment based on replacing insulin. Long-acting insulin analogs are indicated for patients with DM1 who exhibit important oscillations of their daily glycemia, despite its higher cost. Our study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two long-acting insulins, insulin glargine and detemir, in treating patients with DM1. Methods: We undertook a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies (cohort and registry) available in the databases and the gray literature, and a complementary search in the Diabetes Care journal. Outcomes assessed were: glycated hemoglobin concentration; fasting plasma or capillary glucose; occurrence of episodes of severe hypoglycemia and occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. The assessment of methodological quality was performed using the Newcastle score. The meta-analyses were performed on software Review Manager® 5.2. Results: Out of 705 publications, 8 cohort studies were included. The quality of these studies was classified as high. In the meta-analysis, results regarding episodes of severe hypoglycemia ( p = 0.02) and fasting glucose ( p = 0.01) were in favor of detemir. The glycated hemoglobin ( p = 0.49; I2 = 89) showed high heterogeneity and no statistically significant difference between the two. The meta-analysis of total insulin dose favored glargine ( p = 0.006; I2 = 75). The rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia (NH) were evaluated only for one study and showed a significant reduction of NH after therapy with detemir, ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Although some outcomes were favorable to detemir insulin analog, it has not been possible to identify important differences of effectiveness and safety between the two analogs. These results can help in the current debate on the inclusion of long-acting analogs on the list of reimbursed medicines in Brazil, especially with the recent introduction of an insulin glargine biosimilar at a considerably lower price.

Funder

National Scientific and Technological Development Council in Brazil

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference40 articles.

1. United States Renal Data System. International Comparisons. In United States Renal Data System. 2014 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2014, pp.188–210.

2. Lower extremity amputations - a review of global variability in incidence

3. Cost-effectiveness of vildagliptin for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Brazil; findings and implications

4. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Dose-Response Study Investigating the Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Long-Acting Insulin Analog Detemir

5. Insulin Glargine in a Brazilian State: Should the Government Disinvest? An Assessment Based on a Systematic Review

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3