Affiliation:
1. Department of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo, Norway.
2. Department of Sociology, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Abstract
What do the protests against the farm laws of the Modi regime tell us about the trajectory of neoliberalisation in India? In this article, we address this question through a comparative analysis of the farm law protests and movements against land dispossession that mushroomed in many parts of India in the wake of the passing of India's SEZ Act in 2005. Both movements have explicitly targeted neoliberal policies that aggressively sought to remove obstacles to capitalist accumulation. However, the two movements are separated by roughly 15 years, and in effect target two distinctly different forms of dispossession—one predominantly coercive, the other predominantly market-driven. This begs questions as to whether the emergence of the farm law protests is indexical of new shifts in Indian neoliberalism? We argue that the answer to this question is a qualified yes. Through comparison and discussion of anti-dispossession struggles and the anti-farm laws protests, carried out in dialogue with the literature on regimes of dispossession, we develop a heuristic periodisation of Indian neoliberalisation and argue that the now-repealed farm laws and the strong farmers' resistance to them are indexical of India moving towards a 'rollover' form of neoliberalism.
Reference50 articles.
1. Basu R. (2021, January 21). The threat of corporate interests is a key unifying factor in the farmer protests. Wire. https://thewire.in/agriculture/farmers-protests-agriculture-laws-corporate-interests
2. Farmers’ protests in India: introduction to the JPS Forum
3. Special Economic Zones: national land challenges, localized protest
4. Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献