Comparison of Separation Methods in the 125I-Radioimmunoassay of Serum Cortisol

Author:

Gray Sadie M1,Seth J1,Beckett G J1

Affiliation:

1. University Department of Clinical Chemistry, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh EH3 9 YW

Abstract

Solid-phase first antibody (SP), liquid-phase double-antibody (DA), and preprecipitated double-antibody (PPT) separation methods have been compared in a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for cortisol in unextracted serum. Both double-antibody methods gave values for pools close to target values assigned by gas chromatography—mass spectrometry (GCMS) whereas the SP assay had a significant negative bias, p<0·001 (mean biases: SP —8%, DA —2%, PPT —3%). The SP and DA assays gave average values on patients' samples 12% and 4% lower than values by PPT. These differences could be attributed to different recoveries in the three methods. Between-assay precision of the DA and PPT systems was better than SP (mean CV: SP 11%, DA 7%, PPT 5%). This allowed sensitivity in the PPT assay comparable to that of SP and DA to be achieved, despite the less steep slope of the calibration curve. The DA and PPT assays have several practical advantages over SP. In addition, the PPT assay requires only a 1-hour incubation. It is concluded that the PPT separation system is the method of choice in terms of precision and practical convenience.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3