Comparison of an ELISA with a RIA Method for Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein Determination in Screening for Fetal Neural Tube Defects

Author:

Barlow R D,Thompson S G,Cuckle H S,Wald N J,Voller A1

Affiliation:

1. Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London, UK.

Abstract

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was evaluated for serum alpha-fetoprotein determination in the antenatal screening for fetal open neural tube defects. The ELISA was used concurrently with an existing radioimmunoassay (RIA) method until serum specimens from 5000 pregnant women, between 15 and 20 weeks gestation, had been tested. The accuracy of the ELISA was similar to that of the RIA; the median AFP values by gestational week obtained with the ELISA were, on average, 2 KIU/L higher than the corresponding RIA values; the 10th and 90th percentiles, in terms of multiples of the median (MoM), were very similar. The precision of the two methods was also similar. The ELISA method yielded 1·8% results from unaffected pregnancies above 2·5 MoM compared with 1·4% by RIA, a small but statistically significant difference ( P=0·03). Both methods detected the same affected pregnancies identified during this period; five open neural tube defects, three with exomphalos and three intra-uterine deaths. The ELISA method was simple, required about one quarter less operator time than the RIA and enabled results to be generated in one day rather than the two days required by RIA. The ELISA method is a suitable alternative to RIA for routine use in screening for fetal neural tube defects.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Reference5 articles.

1. A serological study on primary hepatocellular carcinoma in Zambia

2. The quality control of alpha-fetoprotein reagents and assay for the antenatal screening and diagnosis of open neural-tube defects

3. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press, 1980; 238.

4. Armitage P. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford: Blackwell, 1971; 97.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3