Dataset dependency of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol estimation by machine learning

Author:

Hidekazu Ishida12ORCID,Nagasawa Hiroki3,Yamamoto Yasuko45ORCID,Doi Hiroki1,Saito Midori1,Ishihara Yuya1,Fujita Takashi1,Ishida Mariko2,Kato Yohei2,Kikuchi Ryosuke2,Matsunami Hidetoshi6,Takemura Masao457,Ito Hiroyasu1,Saito Kuniaki45

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan

2. Division of Clinical Laboratory, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan

3. M2DS Co., Ltd, Japan

4. Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Fujita Health University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Japan

5. Advanced Diagnostic System Research Laboratory, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan

6. Matsunami Research Park, Japan

7. Resource Center for Health Science, Kyoto, Japan

Abstract

Objectives We evaluated the applicability of a machine learning–based low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) estimation method and the influence of the characteristics of the training datasets. Methods Three training datasets were chosen from training datasets: health check-up participants at the Resource Center for Health Science ( N = 2664), clinical patients at Gifu University Hospital ( N = 7409), and clinical patients at Fujita Health University Hospital ( N = 14,842). Nine different machine learning models were constructed through hyperparameter tuning and 10-fold cross-validation. Another test dataset of another 3711 clinical patients at Fujita Health University Hospital was selected as the test set used for comparing and validating the model against the Friedewald formula and the Martin method. Results The coefficients of determination of the models trained on the health check-up dataset produced coefficients of determination that were equal to or inferior to those of the Martin method. In contrast, the coefficients of determination of several models trained on clinical patients exceeded those of the Martin method. The means of the differences and the convergences to the direct method were higher for the models trained on the clinical patients' dataset than for those trained on the health check-up participants' dataset. The models trained on the latter dataset tended to overestimate the 2019 ESC/EAS Guideline for LDL-cholesterol classification. Conclusion Although machine learning models provide valuable method for LDL-C estimates, they should be trained on datasets with matched characteristics. The versatility of machine learning methods is another important consideration.

Funder

Fujita Health University Graduate School

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3