An Appraisal of the “Vacutainer” System for Blood Collection

Author:

Ames A. C.1,Bamford E.1

Affiliation:

1. Neath General Hospital, Neath, Glamorgan, South Wales

Abstract

The conventional syringe/needle/container system for the collection and handling of blood samples is compared with the Vacutainer system using evacuated tubes. The relative advantages and disadvantages of both systems are evaluated. The Vacutainer system is quicker and simpler to use, with greater versatility, producing blood specimens of higher quality and at a cost comparable with that by the syringe system. The problems of blood contamination during blood sampling and distribution with both systems are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Blood Culture Contamination: Still Hazy After All These Years;Clinical Microbiology Newsletter;2021-02

2. A comparison of venous blood gas analysis with paired specimens collected in syringes and evacuated blood collection tubes;Clinica Chimica Acta;2020-11

3. Who decides whether one should “vacutube” or not?;Medical Journal of Australia;1990-09

4. The Society for Applied Bacteriology;Journal of Applied Bacteriology;1987-05

5. Some Problems in the Use of “Vacutainers”;Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine;1975-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3