Between-Country Comparability of Clinical Chemistry Results: An International Quality Assessment Survey of 17 Analytes in Six European Countries through Existing National Schemes

Author:

Jansen R T P,Bullock D G1,Vassault A2,Baadenhuijsen H3,De Leenheer A4,Dumont G2,de Verdier C-H5,Zender R6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham BI5 2TH, UK (UK NEQAS)

2. Department of Biochemistry A, Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, Paris, France (SFBC)

3. St Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (SKZL)

4. Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Analyses, University of Gent, B-9000 Gent, Belgium (CKBB)

5. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Uppsala University, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden (EKS-U/EKS-V)

6. Laboratoire de l'Hôpital, CH 2301 La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland (CSCQ)

Abstract

Two lyophilized control sera were distributed through seven national external quality assessment schemes in six European countries—Belgium, Switzerland, France, The Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom—participated in the study. The results for 17 routine analytes were obtained from almost 5000 laboratories for the two sera. The organizers of the schemes were asked to process the results according to a common outlier removal procedure, and submit method-related data if available. The two sera were also distributed through the external/internal scheme of The Netherlands, and the within-laboratory standard deviations calculated in this scheme have been used in a scaling procedure for the external mean values and between-laboratory standard deviations of the participating countries. The results show remarkable agreement in the national mean values for practically all analytes, but considerable differences in the between-laboratory variation. Data from comparable method groups was obtained for 12 analytes from Belgium, France, The Netherlands and the UK. Though revealing some specific differences between methods and countries, the method-related data are generally in agreement with the all-method data. In this study reference method values were only available for cholesterol. The high degree of agreement found suggests, however, that mutual recognition of all-method mean values in national schemes could be acceptable, especially for analytes for which reliable reference methods are not available. The major element of variation is between-laboratory rather than between-country.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The quest for equivalence of test results: the pilgrimage of the Dutch Calibration 2.000 program for metrological traceability;Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM);2018-01-17

2. A model for harmonization of routine clinical chemistry results between clinical laboratories;Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine;2000-05-01

3. 5.2 Transferability of Clinical Laboratory Data;Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences;1993-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3