Do Electronic Discharge Summaries Contain More Complete Medication Information? A Retrospective Analysis of Paper versus Electronic Discharge Summaries

Author:

Lehnbom Elin C1,Raban Magdalena Z2,Walter Scott R3,Richardson Katrina4,Westbrook Johanna I5

Affiliation:

1. Elin C Lehnbom, BPharmSc, MPharmSc, MClinPharm, PhD, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, UNSW Medicine, Level 1, AGSM Building (G27), The University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney NSW 2052 Australia, Telephone: +61 2 9385 1465, Fax: +61 2 9385 8280

2. Magdalena Z Raban, BPharm, MIPH (Honours), Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052

3. Scott R Walter, BA, GradDipEd, MBiostat, Biostatistician, Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052

4. Katrina Richardson, BPharm, DipHospPharm, Pharmacist - eMedicines Management, IT Service Centre, St Vincent's Health Australia (NSW), Rushcutters Bay NSW 2011

5. Johanna I Westbrook, BAppSc, GradDipAppEpid, MHA, PhD, Professor and Director, Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052

Abstract

Complete, accurate and timely hospital discharge summaries are important for continuity of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an electronic discharge summary system in improving the medication information provided compared to the information in paper discharge summaries. We conducted a retrospective audit of 199 paper and 200 electronic discharge summaries from a 350-bed teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. The completeness of medication information, and whether medication changes during the admission were explained, were assessed. Further, the likelihood of any incomplete information having an impact on continuity of care was assessed. There were 1352 and 1771 medication orders assessed in paper and electronic discharge summaries, respectively. Of these, 90.9% and 93.4% were complete in paper and electronic discharge summaries, respectively. The dose (OR 25.24, 95%CI: 3.41–186.9) and route (OR 8.65, 95%CI: 3.46–21.59) fields of medication orders, were more likely to be complete in electronic as compared with paper discharge summaries. There was no difference for drug frequency (OR 1.09, 95%CI: 0.77–1.55). There was no significant improvement in the proportion of incomplete medication orders rated as unclear and likely to impede continuity of care in paper compared with electronic discharge summaries (7.3% vs. 6.5%). Of changes to medication regimen, only medication additions were more likely to be explained in the electronic (n=253, 37.2%) compared to paper (n=104, 14.3%) discharge summaries (OR 3.14; 95%CI: 2.20–4.18). In summary, electronic discharge summaries offer some improvements over paper discharge summaries in terms of the quality of medication information documented. However, explanations of changes to medication regimens remained low, despite this being crucial information. Future efforts should focus on including the rationale for changes to medication regimens in discharge summaries.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Leadership and Management

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3