Performance of hospital administrative data for detection of sepsis in Australia: The sepsis coding and documentation (SECOND) study

Author:

Duke Graeme J12ORCID,Bishara Maria3,Hirth Steve12,Lim Lyn-Li245ORCID,Worth Leon J67

Affiliation:

1. Eastern Health Intensive Care Research, Box Hill, AU-VIC, Australia

2. Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, AU-VIC, Australia

3. Department of Medicine, Eastern Health, Box Hill, AU-VIC, Australia

4. Infectious Diseases Department, Eastern Health, Box Hill, AU-VIC, Australia

5. Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, AU-VIC, Australia

6. Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

7. National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Background Sepsis is the world’s leading cause of death and its detection from a range of data and coding sources, consistent with consensus clinical definition, is desirable. Objective To evaluate the performance of three coding definitions (explicit, implicit, and newly proposed synchronous method) for sepsis derived from administrative data compared to a clinical reference standard. Method Extraction of administrative coded data from Australian metropolitan teaching hospital with 25,000 annual overnight admissions compared to clinical review of medical records; 313 (27.9%) randomly selected adult multi-day stay hospital separations from 1,123 separations with acute infection during July 2019. Estimated prevalence and performance metrics, including positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC). Results Clinical prevalence of sepsis was estimated at 10.7 (95% CI = 10.3–11.3) per 100 separations, and mortality rate of 11.6 (95% CI = 10.3–13.0) per 100 sepsis separations. Explicit method for case detection had high PPV (93.2%) but low NPV (55.8%) compared to the standard implicit method (74.1 and 66.3%, respectively) and proposed synchronous method (80.4% and 80.0%) compared to a standard clinical case definition. ROC for each method: 0.618 (95% CI = 0.538–0.654), 0.698 (95% CI = 0.648–0.748), and 0.802 (95% CI = 0.757–0.846), respectively. Conclusion In hospitalised Australian patients with community-onset sepsis, the explicit method for sepsis case detection underestimated prevalence. Implicit methods were consistent with consensus definition for sepsis, and proposed synchronous method had better performance.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Leadership and Management

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3