Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, Huntingdon College, Montgomery, AL, USA
2. Department of Economics, KIMEP University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Abstract
China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been a polarising issue throughout the world, with analysts viewing it as either advancing China's desire to remake the world according to its plans, having the potential for, or indeed about, mutual benefit, or too ad-hoc and thus impossible to predict how it will develop. In this article, we present our findings from a survey that we conducted with university students in Almaty, Kazakhstan on views towards BRI. There are two main findings. First, the majority of our participants view BRI as bad for Kazakhstan. Second, one's political views, specifically whether one embraces authoritarian or conservative views (on the one hand) or democratic views (on the other), correlate with the way that person views BRI. In particular, we found that those who espouse authoritarian or conservative views consistently and with statistical significance view the initiative in higher regard than those who embrace democratic political views. To explain this pattern, we draw from social identity theory.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference57 articles.
1. The Impact of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank on the United Nations
2. American Enterprise Institute's China Global Investment Tracker (2023) Available at: https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/ (accessed 4 October 2023).
3. Anonymous 1 (2022) interview, Chinese oil company manager, Almaty, 10 May.
4. Anonymous 2 (2020) interview, former Foreign Ministry official, Almaty, 17 June.
5. Anonymous 3 (2020) interview, Kazakh international relations scholar, Almaty, 15 June.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献