Affiliation:
1. Attorney, Maryland and DC Bar, United States; Affiliated Transnational Faculty, Peking University School of Transnational Law; and Lecturer, Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law. This article is a short version of the author’s chapter in the book Legal Education in Asia, Shuvro Prosun Sarker (ed.), Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2013. Permission from the Eleven International Publishing is kindly acknowledged.
Abstract
After presenting a brief history of Chinese legal education, this article describes current law training programmes, innovative efforts to incorporate global perspectives into legal education, the birth of Chinese clinical legal education, and some of these challenges facing traditional law schools and the legal profession. It identifies efforts at reform, such as young experimental law schools with emphasis on comparative law and skills training and the state’s new plan to reform and improve higher legal education with greater emphasis on practical legal training, global law and training for rural legal workers. The article concludes by recommending a number of additional responses to the challenges facing legal education, including further reforms to fund quality skills training, expand global and comparative approaches across different types of legal education, institute new incentives for faculty and teaching innovations and reduce teaching workloads and class sizes.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献