Affiliation:
1. University of Oslo, Norway,
2. University of Tasmania, Australia,
Abstract
Why do certain landscapes become contested sites for claims about identity? In responding to this question, we approach landscapes as assemblages of human and non-human elements that reach beyond the confines of their immediate physical and temporal locations. Our empirical focus is a small group of pine trees in a Tasmanian suburb, where remnants of human and non-human migration are inscribed and live on in the landscape and in human memory. We demonstrate how the trees simultaneously invite and resist purification through binaries such as nature and culture, wild and domestic, then and now. The histories and futures of belonging assembled in and through these trees are nothing less than active, idiosyncratic and ongoing processes of differentiation that shed light on the working out of postcolonial, globalizing societies and ecologies.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Archeology,Anthropology
Reference55 articles.
1. Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John ( 2005) ‘Naturing the Nation: Aliens, Apocalypse, and the Postcolonial State’, in Thomas. B. Hansen and Finn Stepputat (eds) Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants and States in the Postcolonial World , pp. 120-47. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Cronon, William ( 1996) ‘The Trouble with Wilderness, or Getting Back to the Wrong Nature’, in William Cronon (ed.) Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature , pp. 69-113. New York: W.W. Norton.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献