Populations trust in the child protection system: A cross-country comparison of nine high-income jurisdictions

Author:

Skivenes Marit1ORCID,Benbenishty Rami2

Affiliation:

1. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

2. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

In this study, we examine the trust placed by the populations of nine jurisdictions in their child protection systems. These systems protect children’s rights and grant authority for invasive interventions to curtail or even terminate parental rights and responsibilities. We have representative samples of the populations of each jurisdiction. The results show that about 40–50% of respondents express trust in the child protection agencies, social workers and judges who make decisions. There are clear differences between jurisdictions, with the Anglo-American countries at the lower end of the trust scale. Examining the impact of institutional context, we find that institutional context matters for the degree of peoples’ trust in the child protection system. This indicates that the typology of child protection systems has relevance, and more empirical studies are encouraged. Some demographic characteristics (age, having children, income, education) and ideological variables (political orientation) are also correlated with trust levels.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,General Social Sciences

Reference49 articles.

1. Baldassare M, Bonner D, Dykman A, et al. (2020) PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and Their Government. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California. https://www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/crosstabs-all-adults-0520.pdf (accessed 30 March 2022).

2. Are children oppressed? The timely importance of answering this question

3. Trends and Issues in the U.S. Child Welfare System

4. Parental Freedom in the Context of Risk to the Child: Citizens’ Views of Child Protection and the State in the US and Norway

5. The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people's willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3