The comparative mental health of Australian doctors before and during COVID-19: A population-based approach

Author:

Hoang Kevin Thien Anh1ORCID,Morris Richard W234ORCID,Naehrig Diana Nicole23ORCID,Glozier Nick235

Affiliation:

1. Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia

2. Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia

3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

4. School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia

5. Professor Marie Bashir Centre, Sydney LHD, Camperdown, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Objective: Occupational surveys of doctors consistently show higher rates of depression and anxiety than reported in general population surveys, findings replicated in all other occupational groups, suggesting potential selection bias. We evaluated the comparative mental health of different occupations in Australia from the same sampling frame over the past 6 years and assessed whether COVID-19 differentially affected different occupational groups. Methods: We analysed six annual data waves (2015–2020) from the nationally representative ‘Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia’ study. Mental health (Mental Health Inventory–5 from the 36-Item Short Form Survey) and life satisfaction scores of doctors over this period were compared with five other professions and all other employees. Regression models were adjusted for age, gender, income and work hours. Two-way analysis of variance examined the comparative changes in mental health among occupations between 2019 and after exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic in late 2020. Results: The sample of 15,174 employed respondents included 106 doctors. The 5-year mean mental health score for doctors (M = 78.7; SD = 13.1) was significantly higher than that for teachers ( M = 75.6; SD = 14.9), nurses and midwives (M = 76.6; SD = 15.9), lawyers (M = 74.2; SD = 16.1), accountants (M = 74.2; SD = 16.5) and all other employed respondents (M = 73.1, SD = 16.7) ( p < 0.001). Cognitive wellbeing comparisons were similar. There were no significant changes in professionals’ mental health over this period except for an improvement in engineers and a decline for teachers. From 2019 to 2020, all occupations suffered mental health declines without any significant inter-occupational differences. Conclusion: Australian doctors identified from a population-based sample rather than occupational surveys reported better levels of mental health and greater life satisfaction than most professions prior to COVID-19 without experiencing the worsening seen in the general employed population over the past 5 years. From 2020, there was a mental health decline in all of the employed population, not disproportionately affecting doctors. Although over-representing Australian trained general practitioners, the results from both this sample and other tentative findings challenge the discourse in medical advocacy, but need more formal comparative studies to confirm.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. The mental health of Australian medical practitioners during Covid-19

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2021) First insights from the National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing, 2020-21. Available at: www.abs.gov.au/articles/first-insights-national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing-2020-21 (accessed 28 February 2022).

3. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing (2013) National mental health report. Available at: www1.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-pubs-n-report13-toc~mental-pubs-n-report13-3~mental-pubs-n-report13-3-2~mental-pubs-n-report13-3-2-ind1a (accessed 22 November 2021).

4. Assessing distress in the community: psychometric properties and crosswalk comparison of eight measures of psychological distress

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3