ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder in mental health support-seeking former-serving Australian defence force veterans

Author:

Bressington Daniel1ORCID,Hyland Philip2,Steele Hannah3,Byrne Mitchell1,Mitchell David14ORCID,Keane Carol1,Shevlin Mark5,Ho Grace6ORCID,Murta Janina Catalao Dionisio1,Easpaig Bróna Nic Giolla1,Liu Xianliang1,Zhai Jianxia7,Murphy Dominic89,Karatzias Thanos1011

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia

2. Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland

3. Veteran Medical, Perth, WA, Australia

4. Department of Health, Office of the Chief Psychiatrist, Darwin, NT, Australia

5. School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland

6. School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China SAR

7. STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

8. Department of Research, Combat Stress, Leatherhead, UK

9. King’s Centre for Military Health Research, King’s College London, London, UK

10. School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK

11. Rivers Centre for Traumatic Stress, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Background: ICD-11 complex post-traumatic stress disorder is a more severe condition than post-traumatic stress disorder, and recent studies indicate it is more prevalent among military samples. In this study, we tested the psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire, assessed the relative prevalence rates of post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder in the sample population and explored relationships between complex post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder and a range of risk factors. Methods: Survey participants ( N = 189) were mental health support-seeking former-serving veterans of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) recruited from primary care. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factorial validity of the International Trauma Questionnaire. Results: The latent structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire was best represented by a two-factor second-order model consistent with the ICD-11 model of complex post-traumatic stress disorder. The International Trauma Questionnaire scale scores demonstrated excellent internal reliability. Overall, 9.1% (95% confidence interval = [4.8%, 13.5%]) met diagnostic requirements for post-traumatic stress disorder and an additional 51.4% (95% confidence interval = [44.0%, 58.9%]) met requirements for complex post-traumatic stress disorder. Those meeting diagnostic requirements for complex post-traumatic stress disorder were more likely to have served in the military for 15 years or longer, had a history of more traumatic life events and had the highest levels of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms. Conclusion: The International Trauma Questionnaire can effectively distinguish between post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder within primary care samples of Australian Defence Force veterans. A significantly greater proportion of Australian Defence Force veterans met criteria for complex post-traumatic stress disorder than post-traumatic stress disorder. Australian military mental health services should adopt the International Trauma Questionnaire to routinely screen for complex post-traumatic stress disorder and develop complex post-traumatic stress disorder specific interventions to promote recovery in Australian Defence Force veterans with complex post-traumatic stress disorder.

Funder

Charles Darwin University

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3