Understanding service demand for mental health among Australians aged 16 to 64 years according to their possible need for treatment

Author:

Harris Meredith G12,Diminic Sandra12,Burgess Philip M1,Carstensen Georgia1,Stewart Gavin3,Pirkis Jane4,Whiteford Harvey A12

Affiliation:

1. School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

2. Policy and Evaluation Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia

3. Applied Epidemiology, Sydney, Australia

4. Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Background: To inform decisions about mental health resource allocation, planners require reliable estimates of people who report service demand (i.e. people who use or want mental health services) according to their level of possible need. Methods: Using data on 6915 adults aged 16–64 years in Australia’s 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing, we examined past-year service demand among respondents grouped into four levels of possible need: (a) 12-month mental disorder; (b) lifetime but no 12-month mental disorder; (c) any other indicator of possible need (12-month symptoms or reaction to stressful event, or lifetime hospitalisation); (d) no indicator of possible need. Multivariate logistic regression analyses examined correlates of service demand, separately for respondents in each of levels 1–3. Results: Sixteen per cent of Australian adults reported service demand, of whom one-third did not meet criteria for a 12-month mental disorder (equivalent to 5.7% of the adult population). Treatment patterns tended to follow a gradient defined by level of possible need. For example, service users with a 12-month disorder received, on average, 1.6–3.9 times more consultations than their counterparts in other levels of possible need, and had 1.9–2.2 times higher rates of psychologist consultation. Service users with a lifetime but not 12-month disorder or any other indicator of need consumed a similar average number of services to people with mild 12-month mental disorders, but received relatively fewer services involving the mental health sector. Service demand was associated with increased suicidality and psychological distress in all levels of possible need examined, and with poorer clinical and functional status for those with 12-month or lifetime disorders. Conclusions: Many Australians reporting service demand do not meet criteria for a current mental disorder, but may require services to maintain recovery following a past episode or because they are experiencing symptoms and significant psychological distress.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Population level of unmet need for mental healthcare in Europe

2. Depression is very disabling

3. Assessing Population Need for Mental Health Care: A Review of Approaches and Predictors

4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008) Information Paper: An Introduction to Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), 2006 (Cat. No. 2039.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

5. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing: Users’ Guide (Cat. No. 4327.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3