Comparison of mothership versus drip-and-ship models in treating patients with acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Mohamed Ahmed1,Fatima Nida2ORCID,Shuaib Ashfaq3ORCID,Saqqur Maher4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology (Physiology), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

3. Department of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

4. Department of Neuroscience, MSK Trillium Hospital, Institute for Better Health, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada

Abstract

Introduction There is controversy if direct to comprehensive center “mothership” or stopping at primary center for thrombolysis before transfer to comprehensive center “drip-and-ship” are best models of treatment of acute stroke. In this study, we compare mothership and drip-and-ship models to evaluate the best option of functional outcome. Methods Studies between 1990 and 2020 were extracted from online electronic databases. Clinical outcomes, critical time measurements, functional independence, and mortality were then compared. Results A total of 7824 patients’ data were retrieved from 13 publications (3 randomized control trials and 10 retrospective ones). In addition, 4639 (59.3%) patients were treated under mothership model, and 3185 (40.7%) followed the drip-and-ship model with mean age of 70.01 ± 3.58 versus 69.03 ± 3.36; p < 0.001, respectively. The National Institute Health Stroke Scale was 15.57 ± 3.83 for the mothership and 15.72 ± 2.99 for the drip-and-ship model (p ≤ 0.001). The mean symptoms onset-to-puncture time was significantly shorter in the mothership group compared to the drip-and-ship (159.69 min vs. 223.89 min; p ≤ 0.001, respectively). Moreover, the collected data indicated no significant difference between symptom’s onset to intravenous thrombolysis time and stroke onset-to-successful recanalization time (p = 0.205 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively). Patients had significantly worse functional outcome (modified Rankin score) (3–6) at 90 days in the drip-and-ship model (odds ratio (OR): 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–1.92, p < 0.004) and 1.49-folds higher likelihood of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.22–1.81, p < 0.0001) compared to mothership. However, there were no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.87–1.55, p = 0.32) and successful recanalization (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.76–1.65, p = 0.56) between the two models of care. Conclusion Patients in the mothership model have significantly improved functional independence and recovery. Further studies are needed as the data from prospectively randomized studies are not of sufficient quality to make definite recommendations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3