Recanalization after cerebral venous thrombosis. A randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate versus dose-adjusted warfarin in patients with cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis

Author:

Ferro José M123ORCID,Bendszus Martin4,Jansen Olav5,Coutinho Jonathan M6,Dentali Francesco7,Kobayashi Adam8,Aguiar de Sousa Diana123ORCID,Neto Lia L39,Miede Corinna10,Caria Jorge11,Huisman Holger12ORCID,Diener Hans-Christoph13ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal

2. Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

3. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

4. Neurologische Klinik, Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

5. Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany

6. Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

7. Department of Medicine and Surgery, Insubria University, Varese, Italy

8. Faculty of Health Sciences and Physical Education, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities, Radom, Poland

9. Serviço de Neuroradiologia, Hospital Santa Maria/Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal

10. HMS Analytical Software GmbH, Weimar (Lahn), Germany

11. Boehringer Ingelheim International, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany

12. Boehringer Ingelheim B.V., Alkmaar, the Netherlands

13. Faculty of Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

Abstract

Background The effect of different anticoagulants on recanalization after cerebral venous thrombosis has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. Methods RE-SPECT CVT (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02913326) was a Phase III, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter, exploratory trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Acute cerebral venous thrombosis patients were allocated to dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, or dose-adjusted warfarin, for 24 weeks, after 5–15 days’ treatment with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin. A standardized magnetic resonance protocol including arterial spin labeling, three-dimensional time-of-flight venography, and three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was obtained at the end of the treatment period. Cerebral venous recanalization at six months was assessed by two blinded adjudicators, using the difference in a score of occluded sinuses and veins (predefined secondary efficacy endpoint) and in the modified Qureshi scale (additional endpoint), between baseline and the end of the treatment. Results Of 120 cerebral venous thrombosis patients randomized, venous recanalization could be evaluated in 108 (55 allocated to dabigatran and 53 to warfarin, 1 patient had a missing occlusion score at baseline). No patient worsened in the score of occluded cerebral veins and sinuses, while 33 (60%) on dabigatran and 35 (67%) on warfarin improved. The mean score change from baseline in the occlusion score was similar in the two treatment groups (dabigatran −0.8, SD 0.78; warfarin −1.0, SD 0.92). In the modified Qureshi score, full recanalization was adjudicated in 24 (44%) and 19 (36%), and partial recanalization in 23 (42%) and 26 (49%) patients in the dabigatran and warfarin arms, respectively. No statistically significant treatment difference in the modified Qureshi score could be detected ( p = 0.44). Conclusion The majority of patients with cerebral venous thrombosis, anticoagulated with either dabigatran or warfarin for six months, showed partial or complete recanalization of occluded sinuses and veins at the end of the treatment. Clinical trial registration: Trial registry name: ClinicalTrials.gov URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Registration number: NCT02913326

Funder

Boehringer Ingelheim

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3