Methods to improve patient recruitment and retention in stroke trials

Author:

Berge Eivind1,Stapf Christian2,Al-Shahi Salman Rustam3,Ford Gary A4,Sandercock Peter3,van der Worp H Bart5,Petersson Jesper6,Dippel Diederik WJ7,Krieger Derk W8,Lees Kennedy R9,

Affiliation:

1. Dept of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

2. Dept of Neuroscience, CRCHUM, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada

3. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

4. Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

5. Dept of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands

6. Dept of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

7. Dept of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

8. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

9. Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Background The success of randomized-controlled stroke trials is dependent on the recruitment and retention of a sufficient number of patients, but fewer than half of all trials meet their target number of patients. Methods We performed a search and review of the literature, and conducted a survey and workshop among 56 European stroke trialists, to identify barriers, suggest methods to improve recruitment and retention, and make a priority list of interventions that merit further evaluation. Results The survey and workshop identified a number of barriers to patient recruitment and retention, from patients’ incapacity to consent, to handicaps that prevent patients from participation in trial-specific follow-up. Methods to improve recruitment and retention may include simple interventions with individual participants, funding of research networks, and reimbursement of new treatments by health services only when delivered within clinical trials. The literature review revealed that few methods have been formally evaluated. The top five priorities for evaluation identified in the workshop were as follows: short and illustrated patient information leaflets, nonwritten consent, reimbursement for new interventions only within a study, and monetary incentives to institutions taking part in research (for recruitment); and involvement of patient groups, remote and central follow-up, use of mobile devices, and reminders to patients about their consent to participate (for retention). Conclusions Many interventions have been used with the aim of improving recruitment and retention of patients in stroke studies, but only a minority has been evaluated. We have identified methods that could be tested, and propose that such evaluations may be nested within on-going clinical trials.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3