Validation of a simple clinical tool for screening of acute lacunar stroke—A substudy of the WAKE-UP trial

Author:

Arba Francesco1ORCID,Rinaldi Chiara2,Jensen Märit3ORCID,Endres Matthias45678,Fiebach Jochen B5,Lemmens Robin910,Muir Keith W11ORCID,Nighoghossian Norbert1213,Pedraza Salvador14,Simonsen Claus Z15,Thijs Vincent16ORCID,Gerloff Christian3,Wardlaw Joanna M17ORCID,Thomalla Götz3

Affiliation:

1. Stroke Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

2. NEUROFARBA Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf- und Neurozentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

4. Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

5. Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB), Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

6. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany

7. German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany

8. German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany

9. VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

10. Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

11. Institute of Neuroscience & Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

12. Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France

13. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

14. Department of Radiology, Institut de Diagnòstic per la Imatge (IDI), Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain

15. Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

16. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

17. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences and UK Dementia Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Introduction: Lacunar stroke represents around a quarter of all ischemic strokes; however, their identification with computed tomography in the hyperacute setting is challenging. We aimed to validate a clinical score to identify lacunar stroke in the acute setting, independently, with data from the WAKE-UP trial using magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: We analyzed data from the WAKE-UP trial and extracted Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification. Lacunar score was defined by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) < 7 and OCSP lacunar syndrome. Assessment of lacunar infarct by two independent investigators was blinded to clinical data. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value (NPV and PPV, respectively) of lacunar score. Results: We included 503 patients in the analysis, mean (±SD) age 65.2 (±11.6) years, 325 (65%) males, median (IQR) NIHSS = 6 (4–9); 108 (22%) lacunar infarcts were identified on magnetic resonance (MR), patients fulfilling lacunar score criteria were 120 (24%), of which 47 (44%) had a lacunar infarct. Lacunar score was negative in 322 (82%) of patients without lacunar infarct. Patients with lacunar score had lower NIHSS (4 vs 7, p < 0.001), higher systolic (157 vs 151 mmHg, p = 0.001) and diastolic (86 vs 83 mmHg, p = 0.013) blood pressure and smaller infarct volume (2.4 vs 9.5 mL, p < 0.001). Performance of lacunar score was as follows: sensitivity 0.44; specificity 0.82; PPV 0.39; NPV 0.84; and accuracy 0.73. Assuming a prevalence of lacunar stroke of 13%, PPV lowered to 0.30 but NPV was 0.90. Lacunar score performed better for supratentorial lacunar infarcts. Conclusion: Lacunar score had a very good specificity and NPV for screening of lacunar stroke. Implementation of this simple tool into clinical practice may help hyperacute management and guide patient selection in clinical trials. Data access statement: Data supporting the results of this paper are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3